While
looking for the next topic to consider, I have come upon a curious post that
attracted my attention. Certain contributor to Facebook, Borys Filatov, wrote
addressing to unknown persons in Kyiv “Do not forget that we've got a real
decentralization here”. Even though Mr. Filatov qualified his statement adding
“Within the framework of a unified Ukraine”, I interpret this incident as a
serious indication that this country is in the process of imploding for
internal causes.
The
conflict itself needs to be explored in more details. Certain Georgy Yaroshenko
arrived in Dnipropetrovsk and explained to the custom brokers – invited by the
local office of Ukrainian security service – how to pay bribes to avoid
problems with custom authorities. Such a meeting itself was not extraordinary
in the local context as Ukraine is known to be a highly corrupt country.
However, the reaction of local authorities was shocking given the political
positioning and personality of Mr. Kolomoyskyi.
Arguably,
Mr. Kolomoyskyi is the most active participant in the “anti-terrorist
operation” (ATO) against the pro-Russian separatists. He is known for
organizing several “self-defense battalions” paid for with his own funds and
actively involved in the ATO combat operations. Incidentally, Mr. Kolomoyskyi
runs Privat Group that is known for its aggressive hostile takeovers, in which
Mr. Filatov presumably took part as a lawyer.
Given
that Mr. Yaroshenko belongs to the group run by Mayor of Kyiv Vitali Klitschko
who happens to be the key political ally of President Petro Poroshenko, the
phrase “we've got a real decentralization here” acquires particularly menacing
sense. With this phrase, Governor Kolomoyskyi states that he does not consider
necessary to share money originating in Novorossiya with the central
authorities. It is even more interesting that his team considers appropriate to
use their fighting against “separatism” as an argument in their battle against
Kyiv. Essentially, Kyiv is asked to leave Dnipropetrovsk
alone or to face a popular revolution against "corrupt practices."
As a
result of this demarche, the central authority finds itself in a no-win
situation. If Kyiv denounces Mr. Yaroshenko and the practices he represents,
Mr. Kolomoyskyi succeeds in his hostile takeover of financial flows from
illegal custom operations. Then, because such operations are highly lucrative
(some say that legal export-import trades are close to be impossible to do), he
will make a fortune that pays back for his war expenses. If Kyiv sanctions Mr.
Kolomoyskyi, it will lose a powerful ally who is in a position to stall the ATO
in Donbass.
From my
perspective, I find Mr. Kolomoyskyi’s covert coup being as much separatist to
the idea of “unified Ukraine” as the battles waged in the fields by Donbass
militias. If this tendency persists, other governors may wonder if they should
stop sharing with Kyiv in largesse as well. Luckily, they have now “self-defense
battalions” to show people organizing meetings with the help of Ukrainian
security service who are the boss there.
No comments:
Post a Comment